On Mar 30, 2012, at 2:08 PM, Viesturs Lācis wrote:
> 2012/3/30 Jeshua Lacock <jeshua@...>:
>> On Mar 30, 2012, at 1:37 PM, Viesturs Lācis wrote:
>>> I guess that one of these c090, c080, c070, c060 or c020 is the port
>>> address, which should be specified in the HAL file (sorry, I am not
>>> that smart to know, which one exactly; trial-and-error method is my
>>> best friend in such cases).
>>> Other than that - treat it as usual parallel port.
>> So how would that be specified? 0c090? The default is 0x378.
> Trial-and-error method :))
> Honestly I do not know. I guess it could be 0xc090, but I would
> encourage You to try those remaining too, if this does not work. If
> none of them work with 0x in front, then I am wrong. As simple as that
Thanks! I just wasn't sure to put a 0x in front or what.
I just put in 0xc050 and it works!