Hi Ian, Thanks for the Clarification. It's very helpful!
> Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 16:17:17 +0000
> From: scottim@...
> To: xf10036@...; vxl-users@...
> Subject: Re: [Vxl-users] vnl_block_copy implementation
> On 04/03/2012 22:31, Xiaofeng Z wrote:
> > I'm new to vxl so forgive me if I'm asking a silly question. My question
> > is why not, instead of copying element by element, use memcpy in the
> > implementation of vnl_block_copy function?
> No particular reason.
> The more important question is "What is the point of vnl_block.*?" It
> isn't used anywhere, and its functionality is a subset of that provided
> by vnl_c_vector. Unless anyone objects, I'll just deprecate