On Tuesday 30 April 2002 09:28 pm, you wrote:
> I use Joe for almost all my work. But, in general it is said
> that vi and emacs are excellent editors. But I have feeling
> that Joe can match all these editors or may be better than
Of course, joe IS the best editor in the planet :-)
In my university, often appears 'text-editor wars' in the local newsgroups.
After a while, I am pretty sure that i can do at least, the same text editing
tasks, and easier, than experimented users of vi or emacs.
As a personal opinion, emacs sucksbecause its over featuring (nobody can
call 'shortcut' to a sequence of 4 characters, as is common in emacs. On the
another hand, I hate vi modes, because i am continuously typing and executing
Many people arguments that joe is not such a powerful edutor; in VI or emacs
you can even run games, but what the hell, i want a TEXT EDITOR to EDIT TEXT,
not to solve world's problems.
EMACS = Eight Megabytes And Constantly Swapping