Thank you Chris. I will give that a try.
Best regards,
Tamer
On Sep 27, 2011, at 3:42 AM, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
> On 26 September 2011 19:15, Tamer wrote:
>> I wrote a parser a while ago that reads gprof output and does some interpretation of the output.
>> Today I re-installed MinGW and chose to use the latest repository packages (instead of using pre-packaged
>> repository catalogues). Now the output of gprof is different and my parser no longer works.
>>
>> So things were working fine on 2.21.1 but then stopped working on 2.21.53.20110804
>>
>> Is this expected? Is there a place where those changes in gprof's output are documented? I would like to
>> know if I have to rewrite my parser or if I just happen to use a dev build which has changes that are not going
>> GA.
>
>
> Follow-up on the binutils mailing list:
>
> http://www.gnu.org/software/binutils/
>
> Hopefully someone there can shed some light on the changes.
>
> Chris
>
> --
> Chris Sutcliffe
> http://emergedesktop.org
> http://www.google.com/profiles/ir0nh34d
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
> definitive record of customers, application performance, security
> threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
> sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
> _______________________________________________
> MinGW-users mailing list
> MinGW-users@...
>
> This list observes the Etiquette found at
> http://www.mingw.org/Mailing_Lists.
> We ask that you be polite and do the same. Disregard for the list etiquette may cause your account to be moderated.
>
> _______________________________________________
> You may change your MinGW Account Options or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-users
> Also: mailto:mingw-users-request@...
|
