Jim Bell wrote:
> A few days ago you recommended setting WINVER=0x0800
> <https://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=27393015>, but
> that's seems to be incorrect according to
> or at least off the top of the scale.
> There's no reason to set it above 0x0500 (Windows 2000) unless you
> wanted to take advantage of some specific feature, right? Thoughts/links?
Clearly that advice had the wrong value, sorry, I must not had enough
coffee at the time. Thanks for the correction.