Steel Bank Common Lisp

This patch of mine appears to have gone unnoticed; let's retry 3 years  
later! It still applies cleanly.

On Mar 16, 2008, at 19:22, Kevin Reid wrote:

> The printer for FUNCTIONs currently binds *print-level* to 3.  
> However, *print-level* is tested with respect to a dynamic depth  
> counter, not relative to the thing being printed, so any FUNCTION  
> with a name which is a list, inside at least two levels of  
> structure, will never have its name printed. This patch fixes that  
> by rebinding *print-level* to (+ 3 sb-kernel:*current-level-in- 
> print*) instead, and includes a test case.
>

Kevin Reid <kpreid@...> writes:

> This patch of mine appears to have gone unnoticed; let's retry 3 years
> later! It still applies cleanly.

If it's any consolation, I had the first version tagged in my sbcl-devel
mail buffer... this observation may have some relevance to the thread
about developer activity.

Cheers,

Christophe