On Dec 11, 2010, at 7:44 PM, Merinov Nikolay wrote:
> For creating port to x86_64 version of Windows operation system it's
> necessary to replace (unsigned long) with (size_t) in all arithmetic
> operation with pointers in SBCL runtime.
> This work would be interesting for you?
size_t is not the correct type for this as it is not necessarily related to pointer size. C99 specifies uintptr_t as an unsigned integer large enough to hold a pointer, and I'd be somewhat surprised to find a platform where SBCL is in active use that does not have this type.