Cool.
ipcalc included the "BROADCAST=" part, hence the "eval".
- BS
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 21:17, Serge Leschinsky <fish@...> wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> thank you.
>
> BROADCAST=$(sipcalc $IP $NETMASK 2> /dev/null | grep Broadcast | cut -d'-' -f2 |
> tr -d [:space:])
>
> It works. I'm going to submit the patch
>
> Serge
>
>
> On 02/25/2010 05:26 PM, Bruce Smith wrote:
>> the ipcalc should return the broadcast address, so there appears to be
>> something wrong with your setup fix.
>>
>> Try this instead (untested):
>>
>> BROADCAST=$(sipcalc $IP $NETMASK 2> /dev/null | grep Broadcast | cut -d'-' -f2)
>>
>> - BS
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 20:18, Serge Leschinsky <fish@...> wrote:
>>> Bruce,
>>>
>>> sorry for my hasty decision. I need your help. I'm not sure that I've completely
>>> understood how it works...
>>>
>>> Is it correct change?
>>> - eval $(ipcalc -b $IP $NETMASK 2> /dev/null)
>>> + eval $(sipcalc $IP $NETMASK 2> /dev/null | grep Broadcast | cut -d'-' -f2)
>>>
>>> If I configure NIC by setup I get the following config
>>> -----------------------------
>>> DEVICE=eth0
>>> ONBOOT=yes
>>> MODULE=autoselect
>>> DHCP=no
>>> IP="192.168.1.2"
>>> NETMASK="255.255.255.224"
>>> BROADCAST=""
>>> -----------------------------
>>>
>>> Broadcast is empty and I don't understand if it's improper sipcalc usage or not.
>>>
>>> Serge
>>>
>>> On 02/25/2010 05:00 AM, Bruce Smith wrote:
>>>> Either way is fine with me.
>>>>
>>>> If you decide to delete ipcalc, please make the change to setup.
>>>>
>>>> - BS
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 23:07, Serge Leschinsky <fish@...> wrote:
>>>>> Bruce,
>>>>>
>>>>> I see this line in setup
>>>>> eval $(ipcalc -b $IP $NETMASK 2> /dev/null)
>>>>>
>>>>> Do we need to calculate broadcast?
>>>>>
>>>>> sipcalc 192.168.1.4 255.255.255.224 | grep Broadcast | cut -d'-' -f2
>>>>>
>>>>> does the same.
>>>>>
>>>>> PS. We can have the both program of course if you prefer to use ipcalc
>>>>>
>>>>> Serge
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 02/24/2010 06:52 PM, Bruce Smith wrote:
>>>>>> The main "setup" program uses ipcalc, so removing it will break setup.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is there any reason we can't have both programs?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Or how much difference is there in the syntax (how much work to fix setup)?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - BS
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 21:38, Heiko Zuerker <heiko@...> wrote:
>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>> From: Andrzej Odyniec [mailto:anody@...]
>>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 8:37 PM
>>>>>>>> To: devil-linux-develop@...
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Devil-linux-develop] sipcalc?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Serge Leschinsky wrote:
>>>>>>>>> I'm very sorry for inconvenience with broken makefiles.
>>>>>>>> Absolutely no problem. :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So, if we are agree that sipcalc is better than ipcalc, I'll
>>>>>>>> upload the package
>>>>>>>>> and script (and remove ipcalc)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As for me ipcalc is practically unusable. I found and I'm using
>>>>>>>> perl script
>>>>>>>> known as:
>>>>>>>>> # IPv4 Calculator
>>>>>>>>> # Copyright (C) Krischan Jodies 2000 - 2004
>>>>>>>>> # krischan()jodies.de, http://jodies.de/ipcalc
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But sipcalc has near this same functionality. This is nice.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm good with it too.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Heiko
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
>>>>>>> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
>>>>>>> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
>>>>>>> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
>>>>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Devil-linux-develop mailing list
>>>>>>> Devil-linux-develop@...
>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
>>>>>> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
>>>>>> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
>>>>>> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
>>>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Devil-linux-develop mailing list
>>>>>> Devil-linux-develop@...
>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
|