I've debugged the problems, sent email to the list, and worked around
them for the moment, so no need to investigate this. Thanks for the
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Alan Ruttenberg
> I have created a tarball that should let you test my code.
> With the current svn abcl I don't see the same behavior as last time
> (good news) - this time it looks like a compilation problem - if the
> functions where the errors occur are evaluated instead of compiled it
> However it should also be noted that if I am running under slime it
> takes quite a long time for the debugger to be invoked - 5 to 10
> seconds - on the error that occurs. This in itself is a problem as it
> make debugging rather unpleasant. I think there was the same issue
> when I reported the regression.
> You can invoke the test by cd into the unpacked directory and running ./abcl.
> The expected behavior is that a swing window comes up with a list of entries.
> You should be able to select the first and click on the "3" button and
> another window will come up.
> There are two versions of abcl included in the tarball. abcl.jar is
> the version I am using for development.
> abcl-svn.jar is the one I just build from source.
> The ./abcl script needs to be edited to run one or the other.
> Don't forget to remove all the fasls between runs.
> Thanks for any effort you put into this.
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 6:46 AM, Alan Ruttenberg
> <alanruttenberg@...> wrote:
>> Thanks for the offer! I will try to do that.
>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 7:36 AM, Mark Evenson <evenson@...> wrote:
>>> On 10/15/09 2:21 PM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 5:53 AM, Alan Ruttenberg
>>>>> <alanruttenberg@...> wrote:
>>>>>> I'm sorry about this bug report. Basically, a system I've been working
>>>>>> with for a long time has ceased to function in odd ways.
>>>>> Could you provide a bit more information on what the code is doing?
>>>>>> Unfortunately working on isolating the bug isn't something I have time
>>>>>> for so I've had to revert back to an earlier version.
>>> Are we talking about your subsumption of Pellet under [LSW]? If it
>>> is easier for you, maybe you could provide a failing test case under
>>> that software as I emulated the basic principles (i.e. "use JSS!") from
>>> LSW a couple years ago for my own reasoner wrapper a couple years ago,
>>> so I am pretty confidant that I could reproduce a failing test case
>>> involving LSW in short order.
>>> : http://mumble.net:8080/svn/lsw/trunk/
>>> "A screaming comes across the sky. It has happened before, but there
>>> is nothing to compare to it now."
>>> Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
>>> is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
>>> developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
>>> ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
>>> armedbear-j-devel mailing list