>> PPRINT-FUN-CALL-WRT-LAMBDA-LIST is not defined anywhere, and the build
>> breaks with this patch applied.
> Right, that one comes with the patch in (3).
> [which, (3), also has a stale format expression in
> PPRINT-MACRO-ARGS-WRT-LAMBDA-LIST, search for "FOOF".]
> I can create updated patches for (1) -- moving PPRINT-DEFSTRUCT to (3)
> --, and (3) -- removing the format expression if you want me to do it.
As long as they apply and build cleanly in the order specified in the
subject, yes please. :)
(1 & 3 seem uncontroversial to me. Number 2 seems OK as well. Number
4... who are the intended users of these extensions? Unless they are
ment as internal-only extensions they should be exported from SB-EXT:
SB-PRETTY is an implementation package.)