On Tue, 7 Apr 2009, Christophe Rhodes wrote:
> Daniel Herring <dherring@...> writes:
>> 0) I know where the source is, did I miss the documentation?
> Apart from the paper published at ILC 07? No.
I see. ISTR kreuter mentioning at ILC09 that nobody used SBCL's
extensible sequences... Possible marketing problem.
>> Q: Why do methods like sequence:remove ignore parameters?
>> (declare (ignore from-end test test-not start end count key))
> Because they pass on the &rest list of arguments to a different
> function. The named keywords are there so that they are declared as
> acceptable arguments to the method.
Missed that detail on the first read.