Philip Balister wrote:
> ravix wrote:
> I think the low-level support for cpufreq is only in the linux-omap-pm
> branch. I've run this on the beagle, but the stock overo kernel will
> support more things.
> There is a linux-omap-pm recipe that could be made to work for the overo
> I think.
Would you mind providing more information about how to use the linux-omap-pm
branch with the Overo? I've been trying without any success.
First I copied overo.conf from
I then changed the line in overo.conf from
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel = "linux-omap3" to
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel = "linux-omap-pm"
then I copied all the contents of
I am not sure about this next step, but linux-omap-pm did not have an overo
directory inside, so I added it from the linux-omap3 directory by copying to
Now when I try to bitbake my image, which is a slightly modified version of
console-base-image.bb called "sonar-base.bb" I see the following:
"NOTE: multiple providers are available for virtual/kernel (at91, linux,
linux-omap3, linux-bast, linux-rt, linux-omap-2.6, gumstix-kernel);
NOTE: consider defining PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel"
Note that linux-omap-pm is not on the list.
Also, when I try to run bitbake -c rebuild linux-omap-pm I get:
"ERROR: Nothing PROVIDES 'linux-omap-pm'"
I also tried coping some of the patches from the linux-omap-pm recipe to the
linux-omap3 recipe to see if I could enable the cpufreq features.
Unfortunately these all failed to build.
Does anyone know what specifically is preventing the linux-omap3 build from
using the cpufreq features, even when they are enabled via the kernel
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/cpufreq-on-the-Overo-tp21680612p21697061.html
Sent from the Gumstix mailing list archive at Nabble.com.