Home / Browse / CEDET / Mail / Archive

CEDET

Email Archive: cedet-semantic (read-only)

[cedet-semantic] lost completions when variables are defined by other ones

From: bread <breaddawson@gm...> - 2008-11-29 15:08

Hi,

I found that if a variable will be missed from the completions if it is
declared using other pre-defined vars.

For example,

int main()
{
    int bread_a = 1;
    int bread_b = 2;
    int bread_c = bread_a + bread_b;
    int result = bread_
}

the completions will only have "bread_a" and "bread_b", bread_c is missed.

I'm not sure if this is my own preference, though. Fortunately most of the
time i can remember what the var naem is.  :)
-- 
Zhiqiu Kong (孔直秋)

EDA Labs
Dept. Computer Science & Technology
Tsinghua University
P.R China
100084

Thread View

Thread	Author	Date
[cedet-semantic] lost completions when variables are defined by other ones	bread <breaddawson@gm...>

Re: [cedet-semantic] lost completions when variables are defined by other ones

From: Eric M. Ludlam <eric@si...> - 2008-11-29 16:12

Howdy,

  The expression parser, which is used for variable default values, is
a bit limited.  There are many things it cannot handle aside from
basic arithmetic.

  I'd like to re-write the C++ parser using wisent, for which
arithmetic syntax can be well supported.

Eric

>>> bread <breaddawson@...> seems to think that:
>Hi,
>
>I found that if a variable will be missed from the completions if it is
>declared using other pre-defined vars.
>
>For example,
>
>int main()
>{
>    int bread_a = 1;
>    int bread_b = 2;
>    int bread_c = bread_a + bread_b;
>    int result = bread_
>}
>
>the completions will only have "bread_a" and "bread_b", bread_c is missed.
>
>I'm not sure if this is my own preference, though. Fortunately most of the
>time i can remember what the var naem is.  :)