Bugs item #1907834, was opened at 2008-03-05 10:07
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mggrant
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=110350&aid=1907834&group_id=10350
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Martin Atkins (martinatkins)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: list_fonts_with_info is broken
Initial Comment:
$ python
>>> from Xlib import display
>>> d=display.Display("<deleted for security>")
>>> d.list_fonts("*", 2) # Works!
['nil2', '-adobe-helvetica-bold-r-normal--12-120-75-75-p-70-iso8859-1']
>>> d.list_fonts_with_info("*", 2) # Doesn't work!
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
File "/home/martina/working/ATCO_I030a1/Harness/Xlib/display.py", line 642, in list_fonts_with_info
pattern = pattern)
File "/home/martina/working/ATCO_I030a1/Harness/Xlib/protocol/request.py", line 789, in __init__
apply(ReplyRequest.__init__, (self, ) + args, keys)
NameError: global name 'ReplyRequest' is not defined
>>> import Xlib
>>> print Xlib.__version__
(0, 12)
(The last update in the ChangeLog is dated 2007-06-10)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Mike Grant (mggrant)
Date: 2008-07-26 13:35
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=1175208
Originator: NO
Version issue is fixed but the list_fonts one is harder - after fixing the
typo, there are issues due to the way the X server replies with multiple
font names. The handling of this process doesn't seem to be correct and
needs a deeper look.
Setting back to open.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: David H. Bronke (funkiedamouse)
Date: 2008-07-23 16:31
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=240178
Originator: NO
Marked as pending until next release.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Martin Atkins (martinatkins)
Date: 2008-03-06 09:35
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=2027855
Originator: YES
Hi Mike,
Yes, I had also tried adding the "rq.", but got stumpted at the next
hurdle.
Re the version number - I included that only to show what version of the
library I was running - I didn't realize that I was also pointing out an
oops :-) !
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Mike Grant (mggrant)
Date: 2008-03-05 20:55
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=1175208
Originator: NO
Oops, looks like a typo on that line - it should be
apply(rq.ReplyRequest.... On the downside, that makes things go boom for
me at a later point (need more debugging).
The version number is my fault though - I didn't know it was there so
didn't update it ;) Fixed in SVN.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=110350&aid=1907834&group_id=10350
|