David Teller wrote:
> Let me rephrase: I'm waiting for some feedback on either my planned list
> of contributions or my previous submission. I have no clue if my plans
> are acceptable, if the size of my module is convenient, or the
> formatting of comments, or anything else, for that matter.
Having submitted hundreds of things to dozens of projects my advice
is to start small. Small submissions are the easiest for the receiver
to digest and comment on. A couple of small submissions that go into
the code base will ease the way for larger and more complex subissions
often leading to eventual CVS/SVN/whatever commit rights.
Large submissions that from untrusted sources (ie you haven't contributed
something of worth before) are rarely accepted by any open source
project.
HTH,
Erik
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Erik de Castro Lopo
-----------------------------------------------------------------
"Religious moderation, insofar as it represents an attempt to hold on to
what is still serviceable in orthodox religion, closes the door to more
sophisticated approaches to spirituality, ethics, and the building of
strong communities.
Religious moderates seem to believe that what we need is not radical
insight and innovation in these areas but a mere dilution of Iron Age
philosophy." -- Sam Harris
|