On Jan 30, 2007, at 4:49 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> What about all the other files that reference CONFIG_MPC8349, i. e.
> This file just says that MPC8349EMDS.h defines CONFIG_MPC8349,
> which is correct.
> These files define, but do not reference, CONFIG_MPC8349. That is
> still correct, because these boards are all 8349 boards. These
> files also already define CONFIG_MPC834X, so they should pick up
> Kumar's changes automatically.
Yeah, we had this discussion last time I posted the patch and the
feeling was the leave CONFIG_MPC8349 around since that's what's on
(I did this since I've got a board that is CONFIG_MPC8343 and thus
didn't define CONFIG_MPC8349 and things broke).