Andrew Morton <akpm@...> ha scritto:
> On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:33:35 +0200
> Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@...> wrote:
> > Again, about 4 month since last time (for lack of time) I'm
> sending for final
> > review and for inclusion into -mm protection support for
> remap_file_pages (in
> > short "RFP prot support"), i.e. setting per-pte protections
> (beyond file
> > offset) through this syscall.
> This all looks a bit too fresh and TODO-infested for me to put it
> in -mm at
> this time.
It is possible, subsequent rounds of review should be near to each
other, but calling the code "new" is maybe exaggerate. I do not
remember all these TODOs but I may forget (and I don't have my box
right now, so I can't check).
> I could toss them in to get some testing underway, but that makes
> complex for other ongoing MM work. (And there's a _lot_ of that -
> presently have >180 separate patches which alter ./mm/*).
That's fine. If this can help I could try to base next version
> Also, it looks like another round of detailed review is needed
> before this
> work will really start to settle into its final form.
That's ok, I prefer reviews to testing right now. Almost all but 1
patch (which is marked) is unit tested on i386, x86_64 and uml (but
if I don't have a multithreaded concurrent fault tester), so it's
time to catch remaining bugs by review.
> So.. I'll await version 5, sorry. Please persist.
I'll try. I just hope we'll not have it next summer (I know it's my
problem, I'm not complaining on you).
Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale!