Dev-C++

Mike,

As like as all of the recent messages I've posted to this list, sorry for this much late answer. I was too busy as this thread was going on, but I saved it till a time I can answer it, i.e. now!

> You need to declare "it" as being of type iterator. So in the for
> definition, you want:
> 
> for (iterator it = myvec.begin(); it != myvec.end(); ++it)

Although not wrong, but the principle of const-correctness tells us that "it" must be of type "cons_iterator" rather than just "iterator."

> The iterator as assigned above is a pointer to the first element of the
> vector.

No, not necessarily! The types of vector<>::iterator, and vector<>::const_iterator are, as per the Standard, implementation-specific. That is, although they are most likely to be implemented using pure pointers, they are not needed to be so. In fact, they are some widely-used implementations of STL (such as STLPort) which do not implement the above stuff using pure pointers.

Regards,
--Hossein
-- 
___________________________________________________________
Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com
http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm