On Friday 27 May 2005 05:31, Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 03:06:09AM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > On Friday 27 May 2005 02:38, blaisorblade@... wrote:
> > Ok, a grep shows that possible culprits (i.e. giving success to
> > grep GENERIC_HARDIRQS arch/*/Kconfig, and using 0x4000000 as
> > PREEMPT_ACTIVE, as given by grep PREEMPT_ACTIVE
> > include/asm-*/thread_info.h) are (at a first glance): frv, sh, sh64.
> Yeah, that's bogus for sh and sh64 anyways, this should do it.
> It would be nice to move PRREMPT_ACTIVE so it isn't per-arch anymore,
> there's not many users that use a different value (at least for the ones
> using generic hardirqs, ia64 seems to be the only one?).
Then in the generic headers
#define PREEMPT_ACTIVE <the right value>
<do the above coherence test>
Would be ok, right?
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Skype user "PaoloGiarrusso"
Linux registered user n. 292729
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB