|
[Sbcl-commits] CVS: sbcl/src/compiler array-tran.lisp, 1.78,
1.79 fndb.lisp, 1.139, 1.140 seqtran.lisp, 1.80, 1.81
From: Nikodemus Siivola <demoss@us...> - 2007-11-29 17:30
|
Update of /cvsroot/sbcl/sbcl/src/compiler
In directory sc8-pr-cvs8.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv5461/src/compiler
Modified Files:
array-tran.lisp fndb.lisp seqtran.lisp
Log Message:
1.0.12.5: WITH-ARRAY-DATA touchups
* Eliminate some double-bounds checks: since WITH-ARRAY-DATA does
bounds checking, there is no need to vet START and END with
%CHECK-VECTOR-SEQUENCE-BOUNDS.
* Eliminate some fill-pointer confusion: Since WITH-ARRAY-DATA is
used both in contexts where fill-pointer needs to be used, and
in contexts where we only care about the total array size, add
a :CHECK-FILL-POINTER argument to WITH-ARRAY-DATA.
* Do bounds checking in WITH-ARRAY-DATA based on
INSERT-ARRAY-BOUNDS-CHECKS policy -- not SPEED vs. SAFETY
comparison. Adjust tests to check for this.
Index: array-tran.lisp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/sbcl/sbcl/src/compiler/array-tran.lisp,v
retrieving revision 1.78
retrieving revision 1.79
diff -u -d -r1.78 -r1.79
--- array-tran.lisp 11 Jun 2007 04:23:11 -0000 1.78
+++ array-tran.lisp 29 Nov 2007 17:30:20 -0000 1.79
@@ -136,13 +136,17 @@
;;; Figure out the type of the data vector if we know the argument
;;; element type.
-(defoptimizer (%with-array-data derive-type) ((array start end))
+(defun derive-%with-array-data/mumble-type (array)
(let ((atype (lvar-type array)))
(when (array-type-p atype)
(specifier-type
`(simple-array ,(type-specifier
- (array-type-specialized-element-type atype))
- (*))))))
+ (array-type-specialized-element-type atype))
+ (*))))))
+(defoptimizer (%with-array-data derive-type) ((array start end))
+ (derive-%with-array-data/mumble-type array))
+(defoptimizer (%with-array-data/fp derive-type) ((array start end))
+ (derive-%with-array-data/mumble-type array))
(defoptimizer (array-row-major-index derive-type) ((array &rest indices))
(assert-array-rank array (length indices))
@@ -560,10 +564,27 @@
(give-up-ir1-transform))
(t
(let ((dim (lvar-value dimension)))
+ ;; FIXME: Can SPEED > SAFETY weaken this check to INTEGER?
`(the (integer 0 (,dim)) index)))))
;;;; WITH-ARRAY-DATA
+(defun bounding-index-error (array start end)
+ (let ((size (array-total-size array)))
+ (error 'bounding-indices-bad-error
+ :datum (cons start end)
+ :expected-type `(cons (integer 0 ,size)
+ (integer ,start ,size))
+ :object array)))
+
+(defun bounding-index-error/fp (array start end)
+ (let ((size (length array)))
+ (error 'bounding-indices-bad-error
+ :datum (cons start end)
+ :expected-type `(cons (integer 0 ,size)
+ (integer ,start ,size))
+ :object array)))
+
;;; This checks to see whether the array is simple and the start and
;;; end are in bounds. If so, it proceeds with those values.
;;; Otherwise, it calls %WITH-ARRAY-DATA. Note that %WITH-ARRAY-DATA
@@ -589,29 +610,39 @@
(def!macro with-array-data (((data-var array &key offset-var)
(start-var &optional (svalue 0))
(end-var &optional (evalue nil))
- &key force-inline)
- &body forms)
+ &key force-inline check-fill-pointer)
+ &body forms
+ &environment env)
(once-only ((n-array array)
(n-svalue `(the index ,svalue))
(n-evalue `(the (or index null) ,evalue)))
- `(multiple-value-bind (,data-var
- ,start-var
- ,end-var
- ,@(when offset-var `(,offset-var)))
- (if (not (array-header-p ,n-array))
- (let ((,n-array ,n-array))
- (declare (type (simple-array * (*)) ,n-array))
- ,(once-only ((n-len `(length ,n-array))
- (n-end `(or ,n-evalue ,n-len)))
- `(if (<= ,n-svalue ,n-end ,n-len)
- ;; success
- (values ,n-array ,n-svalue ,n-end 0)
- (failed-%with-array-data ,n-array
- ,n-svalue
- ,n-evalue))))
- (,(if force-inline '%with-array-data-macro '%with-array-data)
- ,n-array ,n-svalue ,n-evalue))
- ,@forms)))
+ (let ((check-bounds (policy env (= 0 insert-array-bounds-checks))))
+ `(multiple-value-bind (,data-var
+ ,start-var
+ ,end-var
+ ,@(when offset-var `(,offset-var)))
+ (if (not (array-header-p ,n-array))
+ (let ((,n-array ,n-array))
+ (declare (type (simple-array * (*)) ,n-array))
+ ,(once-only ((n-len (if check-fill-pointer
+ `(length ,n-array)
+ `(array-total-size ,n-array)))
+ (n-end `(or ,n-evalue ,n-len)))
+ (if check-bounds
+ `(values ,n-array ,n-svalue ,n-end 0)
+ `(if (<= ,n-svalue ,n-end ,n-len)
+ (values ,n-array ,n-svalue ,n-end 0)
+ ,(if check-fill-pointer
+ `(bounding-index-error/fp ,n-array ,n-svalue ,n-evalue)
+ `(bounding-index-error ,n-array ,n-svalue ,n-evalue))))))
+ ,(if force-inline
+ `(%with-array-data-macro ,n-array ,n-svalue ,n-evalue
+ :check-bounds ,check-bounds
+ :check-fill-pointer ,check-fill-pointer)
+ (if check-fill-pointer
+ `(%with-array-data/fp ,n-array ,n-svalue ,n-evalue)
+ `(%with-array-data ,n-array ,n-svalue ,n-evalue))))
+ ,@forms))))
;;; This is the fundamental definition of %WITH-ARRAY-DATA, for use in
;;; DEFTRANSFORMs and DEFUNs.
@@ -620,30 +651,18 @@
end
&key
(element-type '*)
- unsafe?
- fail-inline?)
+ check-bounds
+ check-fill-pointer)
(with-unique-names (size defaulted-end data cumulative-offset)
- `(let* ((,size (array-total-size ,array))
- (,defaulted-end
- (cond (,end
- (unless (or ,unsafe? (<= ,end ,size))
- ,(if fail-inline?
- `(error 'bounding-indices-bad-error
- :datum (cons ,start ,end)
- :expected-type `(cons (integer 0 ,',size)
- (integer ,',start ,',size))
- :object ,array)
- `(failed-%with-array-data ,array ,start ,end)))
- ,end)
- (t ,size))))
- (unless (or ,unsafe? (<= ,start ,defaulted-end))
- ,(if fail-inline?
- `(error 'bounding-indices-bad-error
- :datum (cons ,start ,end)
- :expected-type `(cons (integer 0 ,',size)
- (integer ,',start ,',size))
- :object ,array)
- `(failed-%with-array-data ,array ,start ,end)))
+ `(let* ((,size ,(if check-fill-pointer
+ `(length ,array)
+ `(array-total-size ,array)))
+ (,defaulted-end (or ,end ,size)))
+ ,@(when check-bounds
+ `((unless (<= ,start ,defaulted-end ,size)
+ ,(if check-fill-pointer
+ `(bounding-index-error/fp ,array ,start ,end)
+ `(bounding-index-error ,array ,start ,end)))))
(do ((,data ,array (%array-data-vector ,data))
(,cumulative-offset 0
(+ ,cumulative-offset
@@ -655,34 +674,47 @@
(the index ,cumulative-offset)))
(declare (type index ,cumulative-offset))))))
-(deftransform %with-array-data ((array start end)
- ;; It might very well be reasonable to
- ;; allow general ARRAY here, I just
- ;; haven't tried to understand the
- ;; performance issues involved. --
- ;; WHN, and also CSR 2002-05-26
- ((or vector simple-array) index (or index null))
- *
- :node node
- :policy (> speed space))
- "inline non-SIMPLE-vector-handling logic"
+(defun transform-%with-array-data/muble (array node check-fill-pointer)
(let ((element-type (upgraded-element-type-specifier-or-give-up array))
(type (lvar-type array)))
(if (and (array-type-p type)
(listp (array-type-dimensions type))
(not (null (cdr (array-type-dimensions type)))))
- ;; If it's a simple multidimensional array, then just return its
- ;; data vector directly rather than going through
- ;; %WITH-ARRAY-DATA-MACRO. SBCL doesn't generally generate code
- ;; that would use this currently, but we have encouraged users
- ;; to use WITH-ARRAY-DATA and we may use it ourselves at some
- ;; point in the future for optimized libraries or similar.
+ ;; If it's a simple multidimensional array, then just return
+ ;; its data vector directly rather than going through
+ ;; %WITH-ARRAY-DATA-MACRO. SBCL doesn't generally generate
+ ;; code that would use this currently, but we have encouraged
+ ;; users to use WITH-ARRAY-DATA and we may use it ourselves at
+ ;; some point in the future for optimized libraries or
+ ;; similar.
+ ;;
+ ;; FIXME: The return values here don't seem sane, and
+ ;; bounds-checks are elided!
`(let ((data (truly-the (simple-array ,element-type (*))
(%array-data-vector array))))
(values data 0 (length data) 0))
`(%with-array-data-macro array start end
- :unsafe? ,(policy node (= safety 0))
+ :check-fill-pointer ,check-fill-pointer
+ :check-bounds ,(policy node (< 0 insert-array-bounds-checks))
:element-type ,element-type))))
+
+;; It might very well be reasonable to allow general ARRAY here, I
+;; just haven't tried to understand the performance issues involved.
+;; -- WHN, and also CSR 2002-05-26
+(deftransform %with-array-data ((array start end)
+ ((or vector simple-array) index (or index null) t)
+ *
+ :node node
+ :policy (> speed space))
+ "inline non-SIMPLE-vector-handling logic"
+ (transform-%with-array-data/muble array node nil))
+(deftransform %with-array-data/fp ((array start end)
+ ((or vector simple-array) index (or index null) t)
+ *
+ :node node
+ :policy (> speed space))
+ "inline non-SIMPLE-vector-handling logic"
+ (transform-%with-array-data/muble array node t))
;;;; array accessors
Index: fndb.lisp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/sbcl/sbcl/src/compiler/fndb.lisp,v
retrieving revision 1.139
retrieving revision 1.140
diff -u -d -r1.139 -r1.140
--- fndb.lisp 9 Nov 2007 17:38:16 -0000 1.139
+++ fndb.lisp 29 Nov 2007 17:30:20 -0000 1.140
@@ -1453,10 +1453,14 @@
(defknown %with-array-data (array index (or index null))
(values (simple-array * (*)) index index index)
(foldable flushable))
+(defknown %with-array-data/fp (array index (or index null))
+ (values (simple-array * (*)) index index index)
+ (foldable flushable))
(defknown %set-symbol-package (symbol t) t (unsafe))
(defknown %coerce-name-to-fun ((or symbol cons)) function (flushable))
(defknown %coerce-callable-to-fun (callable) function (flushable))
-(defknown failed-%with-array-data (t t t) nil)
+(defknown bounding-index-error (t t t) nil)
+(defknown bounding-index-error/fp (t t t) nil)
(defknown %find-position
(t sequence t index sequence-end function function)
(values t (or index null))
Index: seqtran.lisp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/sbcl/sbcl/src/compiler/seqtran.lisp,v
retrieving revision 1.80
retrieving revision 1.81
diff -u -d -r1.80 -r1.81
--- seqtran.lisp 20 Nov 2007 14:19:54 -0000 1.80
+++ seqtran.lisp 29 Nov 2007 17:30:20 -0000 1.81
@@ -284,13 +284,12 @@
(deftransform %check-vector-sequence-bounds ((vector start end)
(vector * *) *
:node node)
- ;; FIXME: Should this not be INSERT-ARRAY-BOUNDS-CHECKS?
- (if (policy node (< safety speed))
+ (if (policy node (= 0 insert-array-bounds-checks))
'(or end (length vector))
'(let ((length (length vector)))
- (if (<= 0 start (or end length) length)
- (or end length)
- (sb!impl::signal-bounding-indices-bad-error vector start end)))))
+ (if (<= 0 start (or end length) length)
+ (or end length)
+ (sb!impl::signal-bounding-indices-bad-error vector start end)))))
(defun specialized-list-seek-function-name (function-name key-functions)
(or (find-symbol (with-output-to-string (s)
@@ -418,7 +417,8 @@
(values
`(with-array-data ((data seq)
(start start)
- (end end))
+ (end end)
+ :check-fill-pointer t)
(declare (type (simple-array ,element-type 1) data))
(declare (type fixnum start end))
(do ((i start (1+ i)))
@@ -1048,13 +1048,12 @@
end-arg
element
done-p-expr)
- (with-unique-names (offset block index n-sequence sequence n-end end)
- `(let ((,n-sequence ,sequence-arg)
- (,n-end ,end-arg))
+ (with-unique-names (offset block index n-sequence sequence end)
+ `(let* ((,n-sequence ,sequence-arg))
(with-array-data ((,sequence ,n-sequence :offset-var ,offset)
(,start ,start)
- (,end (%check-vector-sequence-bounds
- ,n-sequence ,start ,n-end)))
+ (,end ,end-arg)
+ :check-fill-pointer t)
(block ,block
(macrolet ((maybe-return ()
;; WITH-ARRAY-DATA has already performed bounds
@@ -1062,10 +1061,10 @@
;; in the inner loop.
'(let ((,element (locally (declare (optimize (insert-array-bounds-checks 0)))
(aref ,sequence ,index))))
- (when ,done-p-expr
- (return-from ,block
- (values ,element
- (- ,index ,offset)))))))
+ (when ,done-p-expr
+ (return-from ,block
+ (values ,element
+ (- ,index ,offset)))))))
(if ,from-end
(loop for ,index
;; (If we aren't fastidious about declaring that
@@ -1076,7 +1075,7 @@
from (1- ,end) downto ,start do
(maybe-return))
(loop for ,index of-type index from ,start below ,end do
- (maybe-return))))
+ (maybe-return))))
(values nil nil))))))
(def!macro %find-position-vector-macro (item sequence
@@ -1142,7 +1141,7 @@
"expand inline"
(check-inlineability-of-find-position-if sequence from-end)
'(%find-position-vector-macro item sequence
- from-end start end key test))
+ from-end start end key test))
;;; logic to unravel :TEST, :TEST-NOT, and :KEY options in FIND,
;;; POSITION-IF, etc.
|
| Thread | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| [Sbcl-commits] CVS: sbcl/src/compiler array-tran.lisp, 1.78, 1.79 fndb.lisp, 1.139, 1.140 seqtran.lisp, 1.80, 1.81 | Nikodemus Siivola <demoss@us...> |