|
Re: [Webware-discuss] Activity and Progress (Modified by Mark Phillips)
From: Mark Phillips <mark@mo...> - 2004-10-28 20:18
|
On Oct 28, 2004, at 10:38 AM, Geoffrey Talvola wrote: > Matt Feifarek wrote: >> Hi Chas. >> >> Perhaps the developers can chime in on the version numbering, but I'd >> say that it may be this: although the framework is quite stable, I >> know that there are some things that we all want it to be that it is >> not yet, so I expect this explains the wait for v 1.0. [snip] > I think Webware needs an automated test suite and better documentation > in > order to be considered 1.0. The time is way overdue for a new release > from > the tip of CVS too, but that won't happen until a new volunteer steps > forward because none of the developers (myself included) currently > seems to > have the time or inclination to do it. > > - Geoff A fool rushes in... The automated test suite must surely be a critical path item for a 1.0 release but perhaps a current release (0.8.2?) is more useful in the short term. I have a few days between projects starting next week and I am willing to put in the time to create a new release provided a seasoned resource (or two) volunteers to deal with the clueless questions I am certain to have. I am quite new to the CVS. However, I am getting the hang of it insofar as updating webware projects with current snapshots and I have read the cederqvist document. BTW, I will not be offended if this offer flies like a stone chicken. I am sure there are others on this list far better qualified than I. - Mark Phillips |
| Thread | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [Webware-discuss] Activity and Progress (Modified by Mark Phillips) | Mark Phillips <mark@mo...> |