James Y Knight <foom@...> writes:
> It looks 2.6.18 (on i386 only) changes the "vdso" memory page to be
> mapped at a random location in every process's address space, rather
> than at a fixed address. ("for security!"). This likely completely
> screws over anyone who wants to reliably allocate memory at a fixed
> address, such as sbcl.
Looks like it's time to look into getting the core-relocation patch
-- Nikodemus Schemer: "Buddha is small, clean, and serious."
Lispnik: "Buddha is big, has hairy armpits, and laughs."