Alle 03:29, venerd=EC 21 novembre 2003, Jeff Dike ha scritto:
> j.m.boler@... said:
> > Could anyone suggest the best way to get module support working in a
> > 2.6 version of uml ?
> Look at the arch changes needed to support modules in 2.6 and implement
> them for UML :-)
> > Is module support working on any version of 2.6-uml ? or shall I just
> > try them all ;)
> It doesn't work. I haven't bothered adding the module changes to UML yet.
There has been a lot of post with about the same patch for module loading(w=
a lot of proposal, most are about the same one): why did you never reply to=
them? Were they all incomplete(which is possible) or you just didn't have=20
time? What I've seen was:
1) define an empty apply_alternatives
2) define some constants inside archparam-i386(stolen from an already exist=
header for the i386 arch)
3) export some more symbols.
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Linux Kernel 2.4.21/2.6.0-test on an i686; Linux registered user n. 292729