On Tuesday 24 January 2006 12:14, Frans Englich wrote:
> I think I've found a bug in the handling of lexical representations of
> xs:dateTime. The following expression compiles:
Some more in the similar vein.
This expression succeds to compile:
If the number of years, months, days, hours, minutes, or seconds in any=20
expression equals zero, the number and its corresponding designator =B7may=
omitted. However, at least one number and its designator =B7must=B7 be pres=
I don't think the expression is consistent with the last sentence, and=20
therefore should be flagged as an error.
=46rom my understanding the same applies to the sister types. Saxon treats =
the same way, as xs:duration: