On Thursday 16 December 2004 12:48, Chris Capel wrote:
> I'm not absolutely sure this is a bug, but it looks like it...
>
> (defclass foo ()
> ((bar :accessor cons)))
>
> gives an error about defining an accessor function with a name already
> assigned to a function. If you change the definition after clearing
> the error and re-evaluate,
>
> (defclass foo ()
> ((bar :accessor bar)))
>
> you still get the same error: "CONS already names an ordinary macro or
> function".
>
> Chris Capel
Last time I brought this up Nikodemus answered:
"Say hello to bug #336 from the BUGS file; what you're seeing is not=20
desirable, but it is a known issue, waiting to be fixed without an ETA."
G=E1bor
|