Small Device C Compiler suite

Hi=0D=0A=0D=0AI also install the code to something like /xdev/8051/sdcc/v1.=
2.1/bin=0D=0Aetc. and then specifically make my build script use that so th=
at I have=0D=0Acomplete control over the version that it was rolled with...=
 I have had=0D=0Asome hideous problems with projects being partially built =
with different=0D=0Aversions of compilers... Not usually a problem in the x=
dev world but on=0D=0Alarger projects can be fun! Since then I have applied=
 it to all=0D=0Aenvironments!=0D=0A=0D=0ACheers=0D=0ATim=0D=0A=20=0D=0A=0D=0A=
-----Original Message-----=0D=0AFrom: sdcc-user-admin@...=
=0A[mailto:sdcc-user-admin@...] On Behalf Of M.Ganesh=0D=0A=
Sent: Wednesday, 2 March 2005 2:42 PM=0D=0ATo: sdcc-user@....=
net=0D=0ASubject: [Sdcc-user] Windows binaries zipped files...=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=
=0A>>> From: "Royce & Sharal Pereira" <bethell@...>>> Subject: [=
Sdcc-user] Windows binaries zipped files...=0D=0A>>>=0D=0A>>> Hi,=0D=0A>>> =
Just a thought..=0D=0A>>>=0D=0A>>> Since now Windows SDCC-setup-packages (i=
n the snapshots page) are=20=0D=0A>>> simultaneously available with the (Wi=
ndows) zipped packages, I think=0D=0A=0D=0A>>> we can do away with the zipp=
ed versions- they are redundunt now, I=0D=0Athink.=0D=0A>>>=0D=0A>>> --Royc=
e.=0D=0A>>>=0D=0A>> Hi Royce,=0D=0A>>=0D=0A>> I prefer zipped version, sinc=
e I can download multiple versions and=20=0D=0A>> use any one depending on =
the need of the hour. With setup-packages=20=0D=0A>> going back to older ve=
rsions will be a hassle=0D=0A>=0D=0A> Why would this situation arise=3F I'v=
e always found a newer version to=20=0D=0A> be an improvement over a previo=
us version. Although, I always one=20=0D=0A> tested previous version setup =
file handy, in case of a serious bug.=0D=0A>=0D=0A> --Royce.=0D=0A> --=0D=0A=
Hi Royce,=0D=0A=0D=0AThe code we developed for a particular product with Ve=
r .2.2.1 didn't=0D=0Awork=20=0D=0Awhen recompiled with 2.3.5. That made us =
keep a 2.2.1 handy for doing=20=0D=0Aquickfixes for that particular product=
=2E When we start a project we start=0D=0A=0D=0Awith the latest SDCC versio=
n available at that point in time. We freeze=0D=0Athat=20=0D=0Aversion for =
that product and all product support is done using that=0D=0Aversion.=20=0D=
=0AIt's very inconvenient to be running setup on and off to change the=0D=0A=
version=0D=0A=0D=0ARegards Ganesh=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A------------=
-------------------------------------------=0D=0ASF email is sponsored by -=
 The IT Product Guide=0D=0ARead honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT P=
roducts from real users.=0D=0ADiscover which products truly live up to the =
hype. Start reading now.=0D=0Ahttp://ads.osdn.com/=3Fad_id=3D6595&alloc_id=3D=
14396&op=3Dclick=0D=0A_______________________________________________=0D=0A=
Sdcc-user mailing list=0D=0ASdcc-user@... href="0Ahttps://li=" target="_new">0Ahttps://li=
sts.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user=0D=0A--=0D=0AThis email is con=
fidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is a=
ddressed. =20=0D=0AAny views or opinions presented are solely those of the =
author and do not necessarily represent those of NAUTRONIX LTD.=0D=0A=0D=0A=
If you are not the intended recipient, you have received this email in erro=
r and use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is=
 strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error please cont=
act the sender.  =20=0D=0A=0D=0AAlthough our computer systems use active vi=
rus protection software, and we take various measures to reduce the risk of=
 viruses being transmitted in e-mail messages and attachments sent from thi=
s company, we cannot guarantee that such e-mail messages and attachments ar=
e free from viruses on receipt.  It is a condition of our using e-mail to c=
orrespond with you, that any and all liability on our part arising directly=
 or indirectly out of any virus is excluded.  Please ensure that you run vi=
rus checking software on all e-mail messages and attachments before reading=
 them.=0D=