Yep, I've had a uml kernel running since last night that uses that
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 10:25:31PM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote:
> dilinger@... said:
> > The attached patch prints out useful stuff when a command fails to
> > exec. I suggest using similar code in other places, as well.
> The last time I tried calling perror (or strerror) from UML kernel code,
> it caused mysterious segfaults which I never figured out. Hence the universal
> use of raw errnos.
> Have you run a UML with that patch applied?
It's not denial. I'm just selective about the reality I accept.
-- Bill Watterson