Das U-Boot - Universal Bootloader

On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 04:52:55PM -0500, Herb Radford wrote:
> Took a look in my U-Boot 1.0.0 directories and noticed that there are
> 4 boards which appear to be PXA-based. My question is:- Is this a
> complete port of U-Boot or is it a "work in progress"? I'm just
> trying to get an early feel for the work involved in using a
> PXA255-based board.

It works for the boards in the tree, although there is quite a lot of
stuff which could be improved. There is a lot of code duplication
between the boards which could be put into the CPU part instead of the
board dir and some subsystems surely need more work. But in general,
yes, it is ready for prime time. 

Robert
-- 
 Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de
 Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
   Handelsregister:  Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686
     Hornemannstraße 12,  31137 Hildesheim, Germany
    Phone: +49-5121-28619-0 |  Fax: +49-5121-28619-4

On Saturday 24 January 2004 04:52 pm, Herb Radford wrote:

> Took a look in my U-Boot 1.0.0 directories and noticed that there are 4
> boards which appear to be PXA-based.
> My question is:- Is this a complete port of U-Boot or is it a "work in
> progress"?
> I'm just trying to get an early feel for the work involved in using a
> PXA255-based board.

Should be nearly complete. I think some folks are still changing memory 
layout stuff for ARM. But, overall it should work fine.

Kyle.