On Tue, 2002-09-10 at 02:03, Oren Ben-Kiki wrote:
> What is this good for? That is, in what way is the behavior of a YAML
> application (at any level) effected by the existence of a #SCHEMA or the
> lack thereof?
i'd like to understand that too. i am guessing that clark is proposing
away around these new contructs "in the mean time". hence
well, i don't mind it, in and of itself, but we better get an idea of
the schema direction before we go about creating declerations to support
an aside, more exactly this should probably be #SCHEMA:fucntional or
#SCHEMA:graph, assuring that the markup must comply to the
not a bad idea, all in all. hmmm...kind of threw me with the word
classic. actually, this is a good idea clark!
tom sawyer, aka transami