On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Lars Rune Nøstdal <larsnostdal@...:
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Christophe Rhodes <csr21@...:
>> Lars Rune Nøstdal <larsnostdal@...> writes:
>> > Is anyone looking at
>> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/sbcl/+bug/492851 ?
>> I'm not. If it's a problem for you, can you try following the hint in
>> the first comment in that report, and let us know if it works? (If you
>> can't, let us know how important this problem is for you and maybe
>> something can be worked out).
> I've tried something like http://paste.lisp.org/display/112612 , but
> now the weak pointers (pointing to nothing) seem to be leaking somewhere
> instead; memory use is still increasing, but slower.
> I've tried using SB-VM::MAP-ALLOCATED-OBJECTS and
> SB-VM::MAP-REFERENCING-OBJECTS to figure out where things end up, but they
> do not seem to work or I do not know how to use them.
The above was probably very wrong (:weakness should be :value I think ....),
but anyway, this also leaks so perhaps this stuff is related:
(defgeneric blah-2 (x))
(defun test-2 ()
(defmethod blah-2 ((x t))
(format t "blah-2: ~A~%" (load-time-value (random 42))))
(remove-method #'blah-2 (first (sb-mop:generic-function-methods
In the `test' case (using EQL-specialization) I think shared-initialize
:after (eql-specializer t &key) at line 245 in pcl/std-class.lisp stores
the EQL-spec. object somewhere(?).
Lars Rune Nøstdal