> it may be subjective, but i find it confusing that the package name is
> not prefixed for such symbols printed in various errors and/or
> warnings that are available in the current package.
> this patch makes sure that fully qualified symbol names are printed at
> the following places: redefining in DEFUN, DEFMACRO, DEFCLASS and
> "slot names with the same SYMBOL-NAME but different SYMBOL-PACKAGE
> (possible package problem)".
any words on this?
i've updated the patch to apply cleanly to HEAD. i'm running sbcl with
this modification for a long time now, and i find it quite useful that
i get fully qualified symbol names, especially in the slots with same