On 11 Dec 2001, Petru Paler wrote:
> Did you think of a CVS commit policy? If I have a patch (for example the
> one for __get__ for Psyco functions), should I commit it to CVS or
> should I first pass it by you for approval?
I believe that direct commit would be better, but also that we currently
should keep "experimental/unsure" features separated from the main tree.
So let's use the patch tracker on the SF project page. If you find this
too cumbersome we could also create a CVS "experimental" branch.