On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Ingo Schmidt wrote:
>> I thought it was mostly because we're lazy. ;-) I first wrote the
>> NewtonSolver class as a stopgap to solve problems until I had time to
>> figure out PETSc's SNES API, but now my stopgap works well enough that
>> I'm not motivated to write the glue code needed to switch.
> Does that mean that the PetscNonlinearSolver at libmesh doesn't work
> with any system type at the moment?
Ben will have to get back to you on that one. I think it's supposed
to work with the NonlinearImplicitSystem class, but I've never used it
myself. If it's working correctly, it wouldn't be very hard to patch
into the framework I use, but like I said I've just never had the