David Goodger wrote on 2004-05-31:
> Does anybody use the "exit_level" setting ("--exit" option)?I'm
> thinking of changing the names to better reflect the function.
> From docs/config.txt:
> A system message level threshold; non-halting system messages at
> or above this level will produce a non-zero exit status at normal
> exit. Exit status is the maximum system message level plus 10 (11
> for INFO, etc.).
> Default: disabled (5). Options: ``--exit``.
> I think the option originally suggested by Beni Cherniavsky,
> "--exit-status", is better.I'd also change the setting to
> "exit_status_level".I'm sending this message to gauge the impact;
> will this break a lot of people's systems?
I'm +1 (unsurprisingly ;-). I was just about to suggest a name change
when reading the thread where Felix misunderstood the meaning of it...
Beni Cherniavsky <cben@...>