> Also, did you get a chance to try the cgi exe I sent you?
Yes, Jay, it works as expected! Great! Thanks a lot for providing me with
your alpha this fast!
Best regards
Franz
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: webware-discuss-admin@...
> [mailto:webware-discuss-admin@... Auftrag von Jay
> Love
> Gesendet: Freitag, 09. März 2001 01:01
> An: fgeiger@...
> Cc: Terrel Shumway; Webware-Discuss@.... Sourceforge. Net
> Betreff: Re: AW: [Webware-discuss] Anyone using OneShot?
>
>
>
> On the ComKit issue, make sure there is a directory named
> WebKit/Cache/ComKit. That could be the issue.
>
> Also, did you get a chance to try the cgi exe I sent you?
>
> Jay
>
>
> F. GEIGER wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the hint, it was something similar (some problems
> with my path).
> > But then I got stuck within the PlugIn.py: There were strange
> directories to
> > be created for the COMKit-cache like "<WebKit\PlugIn from archive>" or
> > something like that. After some changes for investigation the
> AppServer did
> > not work anymore. So I did unroll all my changes.
> >
> > I will defer this until I am a bit a more advanced Webware
> user. I guess,
> > that NT is a somewhat peculiar platform in some aspects here.
> >
> > Anyway - I like what I've seen so far. For example, yesterday I played
> > around with MiddleKit and what shall I tell you: THAT is cool, man! VERY
> > impressive!
> >
> > So until now I can say that Webware seems to be what I've
> searched but not
> > encountered in Zope. I recognized myself as one of those
> "Wishing to learn
> > Zope and still trying" when I read Chuck's "Why not Zope?". Within this
> > little time I'm playing around with Webware I could achieve
> already more I
> > ever could with Zope. I guess I were already a Webware expert if I had
> > invested the time I spent for searching Zope doc into Webware
> programming.
> >
> > Best regards
> > Franz
> >
> >
> >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >> Von: webware-discuss-admin@...
> >> [mailto:webware-discuss-admin@... Auftrag von
> >> Terrel Shumway
> >> Gesendet: Dienstag, 06. März 2001 20:13
> >> An: fgeiger@...
> >> Cc: Webware-Discuss@.... Sourceforge. Net
> >> Betreff: Re: [Webware-discuss] Anyone using OneShot?
> >>
> >>
> >> "F. GEIGER" wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> I try to use OneShot.cgi on my NT box and did as I created my
> >>
> >> WebKit.exe.
> >>
> >>> When I want to launch a page using OneShot.exe I get the error
> >>>
> >>> ----
> >>>
> >>> ERROR
> >>>
> >>> Traceback (most recent call last):
> >>> File "<string>", line 17, in ?
> >>> File "c:\program files\python20\lib\imputil.py", line 91, in
> >>
> >> _import_hook
> >>
> >>> raise ImportError, 'No module named ' + fqname
> >>> ImportError: No module named WebKit.OneShotAdapter
> >>>
> >>> [Sun Mar 04 13:41:06 2001] [error] WebKit: Error in adapter
> Error while
> >>> executing script Traceback (most recent call last): File "",
> >>
> >> line 17, in ?
> >>
> >>> File "c:\program files\python20\lib\imputil.py", line 91, in
> >>
> >> _import_hook
> >>
> >>> raise ImportError, 'No module named ' + fqname ImportError: No
> >>
> >> module named
> >>
> >>> WebKit.OneShotAdapter
> >>>
> >>> ----
> >>
> >> I believe that as of 0.5 (or a little sooner) the "fqname" should be
> >> "Webware.WebKit.OneShotAdapter". This should be a simple fix to
> >> OneShot.cgi:
> >>
> >> <from WebKit import OneShotAdapter
> >> ---
> >> >from Webware.WebKit import OneShotAdapter
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Webware-discuss mailing list
> >> Webware-discuss@...
> >> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Webware-discuss mailing list
> > Webware-discuss@...
> > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Webware-discuss mailing list
> Webware-discuss@...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
>
|