Not this specific feature, no. But it's still being worked on.
I've not done much with the jde-import bug. Does anyone else have a
moment to look into that and submit a patch?
On Dec 14, 2009, at 5:37 PM, Len Trigg wrote:
> Tobias Gerdin wrote:
>> The best solution would probably be jde-open-class-source, but it
>> does
>> not seem to offer completion of the class name, for some reason.
>> That is why is usually resort to plain old switch-to-buffer, but when
>> having several working copies of the project open, this gives me
>> several
>> buffers with similar names such as Foo.java, Foo.java<2> making use
>> of
>> switch-to-buffer tedious (a project-specific switch-to-buffer would
>> make
>> this handier).
>>
>> Does anyone know of a good solution to this simple problem? Would
>> it be
>> straightforward to add completion to jde-open-class-source?
>
> I have a vague feeling that Paul Landes is working towards that
> functionality in the current 2.4.0 branch code.
>
> You can also try jde-open-class-source-with-completion supplied by the
> jde usages plugin.
>
> Cheers,
> Len.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Return on Information:
> Google Enterprise Search pays you back
> Get the facts.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> jdee-users mailing list
> jdee-users@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jdee-users
--
Paul Landes
landes at mailc dot net
|