On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 15:47:19 +0900 Kim Shinwoo <kimcinoo.efl@...> said:
it seems i mixed up your patches and put in this instead of an accessibility
one. anyway. they are BOTH in now! :)
> dear all, hello
> datetime items which have format and visibility are retrieved for the
> FYI.. datetime field(item) has type such as YEAR, MONTH, DATE(?), HOUR,
> MINUTE, and one more.
> and each types have different location according to its format. in
> elementary_test, the datetime types has location as following
> YEAR(type): 4 (location)
> MONTH(type): 0 (location)
> DATE(type) 1(location)
> HOUR(type): 2(location)
> MINUTE(type): 3(location)
> then, it comes as below.. (you can check this on the elementary_test()
> - Aug 19 2012
> - 15 : 20
> - Aug 19 15 : 20 2012
> the location looks like priority to display the field.
> anyhow problem is..
> datetime _datetime_items_get() just counts the number of item which have
> format and visibility.
> and the counting number is used to compare with item location.
> in the second case (15:20), the counting number is '2', and datetime just
> check YEAR and MONTH whether its location is equal to the counting number.
> so.. the 15(HOUR) and 20(MINUTE) cannot be a member of focus_list.
> please check the attached patch to resolve this issue and give feedback.
> shinwoo kim.
------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) raster@...