On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Tom Hughes <tom@...> wrote:
> On 29/09/11 13:16, Gaetano Mendola wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Tom Hughes<tom@...> wrote:
>>> Ah I see - the issue is that it has REX.W set (the 0x48 prefix) which is
>>> redundant for that instruction as only REX.R has any effect on it.
>>> It has already been reported here:
>> Is there a work around then ?
> Well the workaround is not to add useless space wasting bytes to the
> instruction, but as this instruction is in IPP that probably doesn't help
> you much ;-)
> Other than that you need to get your hands dirty in the VEX code.
I'm not familiar at all with that code :(, and to be honest I have never
seen it. Any chance of an hot fix ?