> > Eric, what do you say? Is this a good and save solution?
>IMO your solution is a good one.
Ok, i have checked in (v1p4) new semantic-c.el, new NEWS (for David ;-)
and also new tests/test.cpp....Now all wide-char stuff should work. IMHO
1.4.3 is ready for release... :-)
>I think the L prefix must be part of the token value. So it will be
>possible (in future use?) to distinguish wchar_t and char strings.
Yes, i agree. Done.
>I synch. the trunk with your previous changes ;-)