Actually, I hadn't! Now everything works as expected! Thanks!
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Sidney Markowitz <sidney@...> wrote:
> Conrad Owen wrote, On 14/1/09 12:30 PM:
> > Running OS X 10.5.6 on my Intel Macbook Pro, I tried to self-compile
> > sbcl-1.0.24 using sbcl-1.0.21, and though the installation says it has
> > completed and it passed all of the tests (even the additional ones
> > suggested at the end of the installation), both the REPL and the shell
> > command $sbcl --version still claim to be running 1.0.21. Has it
> > actually installed, or is this just a typo?
> I ran into a similar problem after installing sbcl from DarwinPorts
> (MacPorts), which placed it in /opt/local/bin which is first on PATH
> when you have MacPorts installed, and then built sbcl from cvs, which by
> default installs into /usr/local/bin. As a result when I typed 'sbcl' on
> the command line I got the older version that was in /opt/local/bin.
> Typing /usr/local/bin/sbcl on the command line produced the expected
> Do you have sbcl 1.0.21 installed someplace other than /usr/local/bin
> that comes before /usr/local/bin in your path?
> Did you remember to run install.sh as root after you built sbcl?
> -- sidney