Re: [Sdcc-user] binary representation of integer? From: Frieder Ferlemann - 2007-02-17 20:37 ```There's a feature request for this: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php=3Ffunc=3Ddetail&aid=3D882215&group=5Fid=3D5= 99&atid=3D350599 (a handy macro definition (handling 8 bit) is given there.) It is probably consensus that as long as ANSI/ISO C does not specify a notation for binary constants SDCC will have none. (As long as it is not officially defined/proposed having one=20 could be seen as a "customer lock-in strategy") =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F Viren-Scan f=FCr Ihren PC! Jetzt f=FCr jeden. Sofort, online und kostenlos. Gleich testen! http://www.pc-sicherheit.web.de/freescan/=3Fmc=3D022222 ```
 Re: [Sdcc-user] binary representation of integer? From: Mark Rages - 2007-02-17 21:49 ```On 2/17/07, Frieder Ferlemann wrote: > There's a feature request for this: > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=882215&group_id=599&atid=350599 > > (a handy macro definition (handling 8 bit) is given there.) > > It is probably consensus that as long as ANSI/ISO C does not > specify a notation for binary constants SDCC will have none. > (As long as it is not officially defined/proposed having one > could be seen as a "customer lock-in strategy") I think that macro will work fine for me. Thank you. Regards, Mark markrages@... -- You think that it is a secret, but it never has been one. - fortune cookie ```