Ok, I will follow this approach...
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Eric M. Ludlam <ericludlam@...> wrote:
> Hi Alex,
> It is better to to check stuff like this in only in "trunk". It will then
> get brought into "newtrunk" via a merge. If something is checked into both
> independently, it will cause merge problems during the next merge.
> It is ok to check stuff into newtrunk related to things specific to the
> newtrunk branch.
> Hopefully this particular situation will not be long lived.
> On 02/04/2012 05:11 PM, Alex Ott wrote:
>> Hi all
>> One more question on newtrunk - how it's better to make changes to
>> CEDET - commit to both branches, or commit to one, and than merge
>> together with other patches into newtrunk? I'm asking, because I made
>> some changes into documentation in trunk (2 weeks ago) and think, that
>> they could be also useful in newtrunk...
>> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Alex Ott<alexott@...> wrote:
>>> Hello all
>>> I today switched to newtrunk and noticed that
>>> semantic-ia-complete-symbol-menu function doesn't exist anymore. What
>>> could be used instead of it?
>>> P.S. I also committed 2 small fixes: in semantic/bovine/clang.el -
>>> incorrect feature was provided& in contrib/eassist.el we need to
>>> require 'cl when compile, otherwise it will fail on load, because `do'
>>> isn't available
>>> With best wishes, Alex Ott
>>> Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian)
>>> Skype: alex.ott
With best wishes, Alex Ott
Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian)