dkim-milter

On Sat, 8 Nov 2008, Jim Hermann - UUN Hostmaster wrote:
> I found another one and it failed, rather than just reporting none.
>
> X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m222.2 ; domain : 
> uuserver.net DKIM = fail
>
> Any ideas why it failed?

At a glance, no.  I'd have to have a copy of the original to try it with 
my own code.

Jim Hermann - UUN Hostmaster wrote:
> I found another one and it failed, rather than just reporting none.
>
> X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m222.2 ; domain :
> uuserver.net DKIM = fail 
>
> Any ideas why it failed?
>
> Return-Path: <xxxxx@...>
> Received: from rly-da09.mx.aol.com (rly-da09.mail.aol.com [172.19.129.83])
> by air-da01.mail.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id
> MAILINDA011-a89490b3751c2; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 12:50:59 -0400
> Received: from host.uuserver.net (host2.uuserver.net [69.94.104.190]) by
> rly-da09.mx.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id
> MAILRELAYINDA091-a89490b3751c2; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 12:50:25 -0400
> X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.7.0 host.uuserver.net m9VGmmbt024858
> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=uuserver.net; s=host;
> 	t=1225471753; bh=mc8sylvYFfLLoaT+N0ZbbErSHYEWC2cgdiXamUTXwVY=;
> 	h=Message-ID:Date:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:From:Subject:List-Id:
> 	 List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Help:List-Subscribe:Sender; b=j
> 	/SFHSwu7BcfIfgkShMDrJvtc7eDzl7weLq/qK+lLWwI/g4/UbhHEPdKUwOhIXGNNwOW
> 	Jb3tK14jpu2h7P4evQ==
> Received: from host.uuserver.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
> 	by host.uuserver.net (8.14.2/8.13.7) with ESMTP id m9VGmmbt024858;
> 	Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:49:13 -0500
> Received: from host.uuserver.net (root@...)
> 	by uuserver.net (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id m9VGmkqU024827
> 	for <xxxxx@...>; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:48:46 -0500
> X-ClientAddr: 209.85.146.182
> X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.7.0 host.uuserver.net m9VGmaPL024640
> Authentication-Results: host.uuserver.net; dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
> 	
> Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com
> [209.85.146.182])
> 	by host.uuserver.net (8.14.2/8.13.7) with ESMTP id m9VGmaPL024640
> 	for <xxxxx@...>; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:48:37 -0500
> Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m28so748488wag.29
> 	for <xxxxx@...>;
> 	Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:49:33 -0700 (PDT)
> Received: by 10.114.120.1 with SMTP id s1mr10184913wac.31.1225471772647;
> 	Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:49:32 -0700 (PDT)
> Received: by 10.115.72.8 with HTTP; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:49:32 -0700 (PDT)
> Message-ID: <332fe380810310949s5ea114d8p261a6253b5aa4156@...>
> Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 12:49:32 -0400
> To: xxxxx@...
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
> 	boundary="----=_Part_13926_243669.1225471772596"
> X-Google-Sender-Auth: f7ad8f32ff363790
> X-Null-Tag: fb76d1c7646396360acfef306b28bd5c
> X-Null-Tag: 2fb99e142b0ec8117686266bede2591e
> Received-SPF: Pass (client IP white listed); receiver=localhost;
> client-ip=127.0.0.1; envelope-from=<xxxxx-bounces@...>
> Received-SPF: Pass (client IP white listed); receiver=localhost;
> client-ip=127.0.0.1; helo=
> Received-SPF: Pass; receiver=host.uuserver.net; client-ip=209.85.146.182;
> 	xxxxx@...
> Received-SPF: Pass; receiver=host.uuserver.net; client-ip=209.85.146.182;
> 	helo=wa-out-1112.google.com
> X-UUism.net-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
> X-UUism.net-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (too large), not spam (too
> large)
> X-Spam-Status: No, No
> From: The UUCS Weekly Newsletter <xxxxx@...>
> Subject: XXXXX Happenings SPECIAL ANNOUNCMENT
> X-BeenThere: xxxxx@...
> X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
> Precedence: list
> List-Id: The XXXXX Weekly Newsletter <xxxxx.uuserver.net>
> List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.uuserver.net/mailman/listinfo/xxxxx>, 
> 	xxxxx@...
> List-Archive: <http://www.uuserver.net/pipermail/xxxxx>
> List-Help: <mailto:xxxxx@...>
> List-Subscribe: <http://www.uuserver.net/mailman/listinfo/xxxxx>,
> 	xxxxx@...
> Sender: xxxxx-bounces@...
> Errors-To: xxxxx-bounces@...
> X-UUism.net-MailScanner-Information: Please contact hostmaster@... for
> more information
> X-UUism.net-MailScanner-From: xxxxx-bounces@...
> X-AOL-IP: 69.94.104.190
> X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m222.2 ; domain :
> uuserver.net DKIM = fail
> X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version)
>
> Thanks.
>
> Jim
> -----
> Jim Hermann <hostmaster@...>
> UUism Networks <http://www.UUism.net>
> Ministering to the Needs of Online UUs
> Web Hosting, Email Services, Mailing Lists
> -----
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> _______________________________________________
> dkim-milter-discuss mailing list
> dkim-milter-discuss@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss
>   

Perhaps this failed because your signature is not 'simple', as in:
  c=simple/simple 


DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;   ...snip...

Just a thought.

-- 
Brett

Brett Kislin schrieb:
> 
> Jim Hermann - UUN Hostmaster wrote:
>> I found another one and it failed, rather than just reporting none.
>>
>> X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m222.2 ; domain :
>> uuserver.net DKIM = fail 
>>
>> Any ideas why it failed?
>>
>> Return-Path: <xxxxx@...>
>> Received: from rly-da09.mx.aol.com (rly-da09.mail.aol.com [172.19.129.83])
>> by air-da01.mail.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id
>> MAILINDA011-a89490b3751c2; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 12:50:59 -0400
>> Received: from host.uuserver.net (host2.uuserver.net [69.94.104.190]) by
>> rly-da09.mx.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id
>> MAILRELAYINDA091-a89490b3751c2; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 12:50:25 -0400
>> X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.7.0 host.uuserver.net m9VGmmbt024858
>> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=uuserver.net; s=host;
>> 	t=1225471753; bh=mc8sylvYFfLLoaT+N0ZbbErSHYEWC2cgdiXamUTXwVY=;
>> 	h=Message-ID:Date:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:From:Subject:List-Id:
>> 	 List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Help:List-Subscribe:Sender; b=j
>> 	/SFHSwu7BcfIfgkShMDrJvtc7eDzl7weLq/qK+lLWwI/g4/UbhHEPdKUwOhIXGNNwOW
>> 	Jb3tK14jpu2h7P4evQ==
>> Received: from host.uuserver.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
>> 	by host.uuserver.net (8.14.2/8.13.7) with ESMTP id m9VGmmbt024858;
>> 	Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:49:13 -0500
>> Received: from host.uuserver.net (root@...)
>> 	by uuserver.net (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id m9VGmkqU024827
>> 	for <xxxxx@...>; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:48:46 -0500
>> X-ClientAddr: 209.85.146.182
>> X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.7.0 host.uuserver.net m9VGmaPL024640
>> Authentication-Results: host.uuserver.net; dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
>> 	
>> Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com
>> [209.85.146.182])
>> 	by host.uuserver.net (8.14.2/8.13.7) with ESMTP id m9VGmaPL024640
>> 	for <xxxxx@...>; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:48:37 -0500
>> Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m28so748488wag.29
>> 	for <xxxxx@...>;
>> 	Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:49:33 -0700 (PDT)
>> Received: by 10.114.120.1 with SMTP id s1mr10184913wac.31.1225471772647;
>> 	Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:49:32 -0700 (PDT)
>> Received: by 10.115.72.8 with HTTP; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:49:32 -0700 (PDT)
>> Message-ID: <332fe380810310949s5ea114d8p261a6253b5aa4156@...>
>> Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 12:49:32 -0400
>> To: xxxxx@...
>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
>> 	boundary="----=_Part_13926_243669.1225471772596"
>> X-Google-Sender-Auth: f7ad8f32ff363790
>> X-Null-Tag: fb76d1c7646396360acfef306b28bd5c
>> X-Null-Tag: 2fb99e142b0ec8117686266bede2591e
>> Received-SPF: Pass (client IP white listed); receiver=localhost;
>> client-ip=127.0.0.1; envelope-from=<xxxxx-bounces@...>
>> Received-SPF: Pass (client IP white listed); receiver=localhost;
>> client-ip=127.0.0.1; helo=
>> Received-SPF: Pass; receiver=host.uuserver.net; client-ip=209.85.146.182;
>> 	xxxxx@...
>> Received-SPF: Pass; receiver=host.uuserver.net; client-ip=209.85.146.182;
>> 	helo=wa-out-1112.google.com
>> X-UUism.net-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
>> X-UUism.net-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (too large), not spam (too
>> large)
>> X-Spam-Status: No, No
>> From: The UUCS Weekly Newsletter <xxxxx@...>
>> Subject: XXXXX Happenings SPECIAL ANNOUNCMENT
>> X-BeenThere: xxxxx@...
>> X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
>> Precedence: list
>> List-Id: The XXXXX Weekly Newsletter <xxxxx.uuserver.net>
>> List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.uuserver.net/mailman/listinfo/xxxxx>, 
>> 	xxxxx@...
>> List-Archive: <http://www.uuserver.net/pipermail/xxxxx>
>> List-Help: <mailto:xxxxx@...>
>> List-Subscribe: <http://www.uuserver.net/mailman/listinfo/xxxxx>,
>> 	xxxxx@...
>> Sender: xxxxx-bounces@...
>> Errors-To: xxxxx-bounces@...
>> X-UUism.net-MailScanner-Information: Please contact hostmaster@... for
>> more information
>> X-UUism.net-MailScanner-From: xxxxx-bounces@...
>> X-AOL-IP: 69.94.104.190
>> X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m222.2 ; domain :
>> uuserver.net DKIM = fail
>> X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version)
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Jim
>> -----
>> Jim Hermann <hostmaster@...>
>> UUism Networks <http://www.UUism.net>
>> Ministering to the Needs of Online UUs
>> Web Hosting, Email Services, Mailing Lists
>> -----
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
>> _______________________________________________
>> dkim-milter-discuss mailing list
>> dkim-milter-discuss@...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss
>>   
> 
> Perhaps this failed because your signature is not 'simple', as in:
>   c=simple/simple 
> 
> 
> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;   ...snip...
> 
> Just a thought.
> 
Didnt checked your dkim sig
but one thing always happens is
if you change dkim in dns it might take 48 h
until its rightly validated from reflctors or
other verifiers on mailservers by dns caching

-- 
Best Regards

MfG Robert Schetterer

Germany/Munich/Bavaria

> ------------------------------
> Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 12:09:23 +0100
> From: Robert Schetterer <robert@...>
> Subject: Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] AOL.COM DKIM	Check	Header:
> 	X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION
> To: bkislin@..., dkim-milter general discussion
> 	<dkim-milter-discuss@...>
> Message-ID: <491D5C63.1050001@...>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> Brett Kislin schrieb:
> > 
> > Jim Hermann - UUN Hostmaster wrote:
> >> I found another one and it failed, rather than just reporting none.
> >>
> >> X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m222.2 
> ; domain :
> >> uuserver.net DKIM = fail 
> >>
> >> Any ideas why it failed?
> >>
> > 
> > Perhaps this failed because your signature is not 'simple', as in:
> >   c=simple/simple 
> > 
> > 
> > DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;   ...snip...
> > 
> > Just a thought.
> > 
> Didnt checked your dkim sig
> but one thing always happens is
> if you change dkim in dns it might take 48 h
> until its rightly validated from reflctors or
> other verifiers on mailservers by dns caching

Robert, I haven't changed the DNS records in months.

Brett, I thought that relaxed/simple signatures was supposed to make it MORE
LIKELY for a DKIM signature to be verified, not less likely.

Anyone have an AOL Account that can receive test email?

Jim

Hello,

>> >> X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m222.2
>> ; domain :
>> >> uuserver.net DKIM = fail
> Brett, I thought that relaxed/simple signatures was supposed to make it MORE
> LIKELY for a DKIM signature to be verified, not less likely.
>
> Anyone have an AOL Account that can receive test email?

I use relaxed/simple setting and here are my auth results:

X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m231.2 ; domain :
lists.sgmlifewords.com DKIM : 1

I hope this means the mail has passed the test. :)

-- 
Zbigniew Szalbot

At 07:39 14-11-2008, Jim Hermann - UUN Hostmaster wrote:
>Brett, I thought that relaxed/simple signatures was supposed to make it MORE
>LIKELY for a DKIM signature to be verified, not less likely.

Using relaxed/simple makes it more likely for the DKIM signature to 
be successfully verified.

Regards,
-sm