James Y Knight wrote:
> This patch marks the sbcl asm files as not requiring an executable stack
> (which they don't).
> Due to differing build tool flag defaults for the linker in one build
> environment, I actually needed this to compile sbcl at all without
> frobbing linker flags. It works for me, on x86-64, and seems like a good
> idea. I know of no reason why other archs won't work too, but I haven't
> tested them.
Looks good to me. If this ever causes failures on other platforms, they should hopefully be explicit enough. I'll commit this after the freeze.