SAX: Simple API for XML

agreed

Rob Lugt
ElCel Technology

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joseph Kesselman/Watson/IBM" <keshlam@...>
To: <xerces-j-dev@...>
Cc: "<sax-devel" <sax-devel@...>; "Elliotte Rusty Harold
<elharo" <elharo@...>; "<xerces-j-dev"
<xerces-j-dev@...>; "<xml-dev" <xml-dev@...>
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 2:42 PM
Subject: [Sax-devel] Consensus? expected local name for non-namespace
qualified elements


>
> It's been pointed out that my last note was some what garbled, due to an
> editing goof (sorry!) -- let me try again, rephrasing the whole thing:
>
> Do we have consensus that when namespace processing is turned on, a
> non-qualified element or attribute has the same value for both QName and
> Local Name?
>
> If so: we've resolved the subject question; move to close debate.
>
> If not: Could someone indicate where the remaining confusion lies? (I know
> I could benefit from some re-focusing of the question; I suspect that
might
> help others as well.)
>
> ______________________________________
> Joe Kesselman  / IBM Research
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________
>
> Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
> August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
>
> _______________________________________________
> List: sax-devel, sax-devel@...
> See:  http://www.saxproject.org/
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sax-devel
>
>

At 09:42 2002-06-05 -0400, Joseph Kesselman/Watson/IBM wrote:
>Do we have consensus that when namespace processing is turned on, a
>non-qualified element or attribute has the same value for both QName and
>Local Name?

Yes, but remember that it's optional to provide the qName parameter in that 
case.