On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 07:23:54PM -0700, Alexander Roitman wrote:
> > - for people without photos, we leave the photo box completely blank, n=
> > text, no ugly black rectangles
> > I expect the first to be a no-brainer, but perhaps the second may invit=
> > debate, since the initial author of this report (was it Tim Waugh?)=20
> > presumably thought that ugly black rectangles all over the report was a=
> > feature, not a bug. Ugliness is in the eye of the beholder, so I'm quit=
> > willing to discuss the subject and possibly modify my patch if required.
> Here I have no opinion. Definitely, Tim Waugh placed the boxes and
> the No Photo text on purpose, not by accident. As to what's the correct
> thing to do here -- I don't know. I can see both sides of the argument.
> Perhaps the best thing is to make them user-adjustable options. Does
> this make sense? Would you like to tackle this? I can help you in that.
If there are no rectangles, it just looks like a ridiculous amount of
indent for the text, and so it doesn't flow right.