Devil-Linux

I think Serge fixed the only problem I found.

 - BS


On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 07:56, Heiko Zuerker <heiko@...> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> I just wanted to check if anybody found any problems with RC3.
> It has been pretty quiet, which is a very good sign.
>
> If no new issues surface, I'm planning to release the official 1.6 soon.
>
> --
>
> Regards
>   Heiko Zuerker
>   http://www.devil-linux.org
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
> monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second
> resolution app monitoring today. Free.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Devil-linux-develop mailing list
> Devil-linux-develop@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop
>

all good here, no problems.

Dominic

On 04/04/2012 13:46, Bruce Smith wrote:
> I think Serge fixed the only problem I found.
>
>  - BS
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 07:56, Heiko Zuerker <heiko@... 
> <mailto:heiko@...>> wrote:
>
>     Hi everyone,
>
>     I just wanted to check if anybody found any problems with RC3.
>     It has been pretty quiet, which is a very good sign.
>
>     If no new issues surface, I'm planning to release the official 1.6
>     soon.
>
>     --
>
>     Regards
>       Heiko Zuerker
>     http://www.devil-linux.org
>
>
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
>     monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second
>     resolution app monitoring today. Free.
>     http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
>     _______________________________________________
>     Devil-linux-develop mailing list
>     Devil-linux-develop@...
>     <mailto:Devil-linux-develop@...>
>     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
> monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second
> resolution app monitoring today. Free.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devil-linux-develop mailing list
> Devil-linux-develop@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop

Heiko Zuerker wrote:

> Hi everyone,
> 
> I just wanted to check if anybody found any problems with RC3.
> It has been pretty quiet, which is a very good sign.
> 
> If no new issues surface, I'm planning to release the official 1.6 soon.

Heiko,

I found only a cosmetic error. checkfs startup script is not executing and 
thus does not check the disks listed in fstab with six non-zero field as 
should be. Ofcourse anybody, who mounts nonramdisks, can change this script 
and store in own configuration. There is patch:

> --- ../../lfssystem/build/config/etc/init.d/checkfs.orig        2011-12-18 18:46:34.000000000 +0100
> +++ ../../lfssystem/build/config/etc/init.d/checkfs     2012-04-01 18:04:34.280769382 +0200
> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
>  source /etc/init.d/functions
> 
>  # exit if there is no entry in /etc/fstab
> -test -z "$( grep -v ^# /etc/fstab | grep ^$ )" && exit 0
> +test -z "$( grep -v ^# /etc/fstab | grep -v ^$ )" && exit 0
> 
>  #
>  # Activate all the swap partitions declared in the /etc/fstab file
> @@ -110,6 +110,4 @@ else
>          fi
>  fi
> 
> -;;
> -
>  # End /etc/init.d/checkfs

The rest of the packages used by me, works fine.

Best Regards

-- 
Andrzej Odyniec

Andrzej,

Could you please re-submit the patch as an attachment?

-- 

Regards
   Heiko Zuerker
   http://www.devil-linux.org

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrzej Odyniec [mailto:anody@...]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 12:35 PM
> To: devil-linux-develop@...
> Subject: Re: [Devil-linux-develop] 1.6.0-RC3
> 
> Heiko Zuerker wrote:
> 
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I just wanted to check if anybody found any problems with RC3.
> > It has been pretty quiet, which is a very good sign.
> >
> > If no new issues surface, I'm planning to release the official 1.6 soon.
> 
> Heiko,
> 
> I found only a cosmetic error. checkfs startup script is not executing and
thus
> does not check the disks listed in fstab with six non-zero field as should
be.
> Ofcourse anybody, who mounts nonramdisks, can change this script and
> store in own configuration. There is patch:
> 
> > --- ../../lfssystem/build/config/etc/init.d/checkfs.orig
2011-12-18
> 18:46:34.000000000 +0100
> > +++ ../../lfssystem/build/config/etc/init.d/checkfs     2012-04-01
> 18:04:34.280769382 +0200
> > @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
> >  source /etc/init.d/functions
> >
> >  # exit if there is no entry in /etc/fstab -test -z "$( grep -v ^#
> > /etc/fstab | grep ^$ )" && exit 0
> > +test -z "$( grep -v ^# /etc/fstab | grep -v ^$ )" && exit 0
> >
> >  #
> >  # Activate all the swap partitions declared in the /etc/fstab file @@
> > -110,6 +110,4 @@ else
> >          fi
> >  fi
> >
> > -;;
> > -
> >  # End /etc/init.d/checkfs
> 
> The rest of the packages used by me, works fine.
> 
> Best Regards
> 
> --
> Andrzej Odyniec
> 
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to monitoring
Big
> Data applications. Try Boundary one-second resolution app monitoring
today.
> Free.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Devil-linux-develop mailing list
> Devil-linux-develop@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop

Heiko Zuerker wrote:

> Andrzej,
> 
> Could you please re-submit the patch as an attachment?
> 

Of course. But there are only basic corrections, for start and check 
filesystems. As I see, in /etc/init.d/checkfs scrip, there are dependency from 
presence of files /fastboot and /forcefsck, but this files are checked in root 
directory, but root directory is readonly so without changing boot image there 
is no possibility to control fastboot (without fsck) or forced fsck. Maybe 
this files should be tested in /etc, or on usb/disk boot partition? But this 
is to Your decision.

-- 
Andrzej Odyniec

I don't know about the open issues.
Everything seems to be fine.

Serge

On 04/04/2012 04:56 AM, Heiko Zuerker wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I just wanted to check if anybody found any problems with RC3.
> It has been pretty quiet, which is a very good sign.
>
> If no new issues surface, I'm planning to release the official 1.6 soon.
>