On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 04:21:23PM -0400, Houston, Mike wrote:
> I noticed a quirk in 1.1alpha5. If I use the Interpreter.set("name",null),
> the interpreter treats the variable as a undefined (void). Is this on
> purpose? I would think an Interpreter.unset() method might be more
> It's not a big deal, but I wanted to have some pre-defined variables
> available to the scripts. Sometimes, these are null. I wanted the script
> writer to deal with basic Java syntax.
For the next release I have fixed the set(name, null); problem and also
added an unset() method to Interpreter.