It's worth me pointing out that this driver now provides a good example
of the _non-standard_ way of handling properties, which is useful if you
want to do something special when they change. The standard way is to
use them like normal variables and let the Driver base class handle the
messages for them. I really should put something in the wiki about this.
Radu Bogdan Rusu wrote:
> Sure thing Geoff. I'll test it on Monday.
> Thanks, the whole thing looks much cleaner now.
> Geoffrey Biggs wrote:
>> I've removed a bunch of configuration requests from the camera interface
>> which were added for this driver, and replaced them with properties.
>> Could the person who wrote this driver (that's you, Radu) please check
>> that it still compiles and functions?
Robotics research group, University of Auckland