Codestriker: collaborative code reviewer

Hi,

--- DATACOM - Diego <diego@...> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> that is my first attempt to install CodeStriker. I have a running 
> Windows Server 2003 + Apache 2.0.54 + MySQL 4.0.26 and was thinking to 
> use it to deploy CodeStriker. According to the manual, the preferred 
> versions are Apache 1.x and MySQL 4.1 or higher. Is it possible to run 
> CodeStrinker under my current configuration?
>

I am running it under Apache 2.0.54 with mysql 4.0 on debian stable. It should work fine.
 
> I also read some messages about problems with MySQL 5.0. What would be 
> the most recommended configuration to run CodeStriker 1.9.2-rc3? Apache 
> version, MySQL version, Perl version, etc.

The problem with mysql 5.0 I believe was fixed in the latest rc version. If you plan on using a
language other than English you should probably go for the newest stable version of perl. Recent
versions of perl have a lot of unicode fixes that codestriker now needs. 

In general, codestriker works with just about any version of apache. The mysql 4.1 is needed if
you want non-english comments. Otherwise 4.0 will work (I am running 4.0 with English only). Same
with perl 5.8.anything is fine for English only, otherwise you will want the latest stable 5.8.8. 

Thanks
Jason.


> 
> Thanks in advance,
> 
> -- 
> DIEGO Moreira da Rosa
> 
> DATACOM
> Av França, 735 - Porto Alegre, RS - 90230-220
> DDR: 51 3358 0141
> Fax: 51 3358 0101
> site: http://www.datacom-telematica.com.br
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> Codestriker-user mailing list
> Codestriker-user@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/codestriker-user
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com

Hi,

One more thing. We (myself and David) only test on a limited sets of configurations. It is very
possible that other combinations of tools will work just fine. Many configurations that we don't
test on work fine. Perhaps somebody else on the list could respond with a working windows 2003
server + apache 2.0 configurations.

Thanks
Jason.

--- DATACOM - Diego <diego@...> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> that is my first attempt to install CodeStriker. I have a running 
> Windows Server 2003 + Apache 2.0.54 + MySQL 4.0.26 and was thinking to 
> use it to deploy CodeStriker. According to the manual, the preferred 
> versions are Apache 1.x and MySQL 4.1 or higher. Is it possible to run 
> CodeStrinker under my current configuration?
> 
> I also read some messages about problems with MySQL 5.0. What would be 
> the most recommended configuration to run CodeStriker 1.9.2-rc3? Apache 
> version, MySQL version, Perl version, etc.
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> 
> -- 
> DIEGO Moreira da Rosa
> 
> DATACOM
> Av França, 735 - Porto Alegre, RS - 90230-220
> DDR: 51 3358 0141
> Fax: 51 3358 0101
> site: http://www.datacom-telematica.com.br
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> Codestriker-user mailing list
> Codestriker-user@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/codestriker-user
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com

Hi Jason,

one last question...

> In general, codestriker works with just about any version of apache. The mysql 4.1 is needed if

According to section 2.4 of the Guide:

"Apache 1.X is recommended for Win32 systems, as 2.X may have issues 
with running Codestriker."

This issues with Windows + Apache2 have already been solved?

Thanks for the quick reply,

-- 
DIEGO Moreira da Rosa

DATACOM
Av França, 735 - Porto Alegre, RS - 90230-220
DDR: 51 3358 0141
Fax: 51 3358 0101
site: http://www.datacom-telematica.com.br

Hi,

--- DATACOM - Diego <diego@...> wrote:

> Hi Jason,
> 
> one last question...
> 
> > In general, codestriker works with just about any version of apache. The mysql 4.1 is needed
> if
> 
> According to section 2.4 of the Guide:
> 
> "Apache 1.X is recommended for Win32 systems, as 2.X may have issues 
> with running Codestriker."
> 

I think the issues was with mod_perl. If you don't use mod_perl then you should be good. Also, the
last time I remember talking to David about this was at least a year ago (perhaps two years). It
is very possible that the mod_perl, win32, apache2 issue with IPC::open3 have been fixed. My
memory on this is not great and David may want to comment about this when he gets back.

Thanks
Jason.


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com

Hi Diego,

>> one last question...
>>
>>> In general, codestriker works with just about any version of apache. The mysql 4.1 is needed
>> if
>>
>> According to section 2.4 of the Guide:
>>
>> "Apache 1.X is recommended for Win32 systems, as 2.X may have issues 
>> with running Codestriker."
>>
> 
> I think the issues was with mod_perl. If you don't use mod_perl then you should be good. Also, the
> last time I remember talking to David about this was at least a year ago (perhaps two years). It
> is very possible that the mod_perl, win32, apache2 issue with IPC::open3 have been fixed. My
> memory on this is not great and David may want to comment about this when he gets back.

I still believe there are issues with mod_perl under win32, particularly 
when launching external executables, when rendering the parallel view.

You are more then welcome to try it of course, but I know from 
experience, under Windows, CGI execution seems to be the most stable 
option for deployment.

Cheers,
David